Sophia Akuffo Rejects ‘Rubber Stamp’ Label in Mahama’s Council of State Role

Former Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo has firmly dismissed claims that her appointment to President John Mahama’s Council of State compromises her independence, vowing to prioritize impartial counsel over political loyalty.

The move, which places one of Ghana’s most respected legal minds on the advisory body, has reignited debates over the Council’s role as a check on executive power—or lack thereof.

Legal analyst Martin Kpebu underscored Akuffo’s resolve during a televised discussion on TV3’s The KeyPoints, stating, “She will give Mahama sound advice, not kowtow to him. Her track record proves she doesn’t operate as anyone’s puppet.” Kpebu’s remarks followed scrutiny over whether Akuffo, who served as Chief Justice under former President Akufo-Addo, could remain neutral in a politically charged environment.

Akuffo, however, has pushed back against doubts, asserting her qualifications stem from judicial expertise, not partisan ties. “I am there in my own right as a former Chief Justice—not as a representative of the Judiciary,” she told reporters after her swearing-in, adding, “An adviser does not parrot. My role is to challenge, not comply.”

Her appointment has thrust the Council of State into the spotlight, with critics long arguing the body acts as a ceremonial echo chamber rather than a meaningful advisory force. Previous councils have faced accusations of rubber-stamping presidential decisions, particularly on contentious issues like ministerial appointments and constitutional amendments. Akuffo’s blunt rhetoric signals a potential shift, though skeptics question whether one voice can redefine an institution historically seen as toothless.

The debate reflects broader tensions in Ghana’s governance, where technocratic independence often clashes with political pragmatism. For Mahama, Akuffo’s inclusion may aim to bolster credibility amid economic challenges and public distrust. Yet her reputation for principled dissent—famously opposing the Akufo-Addo administration’s controversial COVID-19 levy—suggests she’s unlikely to trade scrutiny for symbolism.

As Ghana navigates polarized debates over judicial reform and fiscal policy, Akuffo’s stance offers a litmus test: Can the Council of State evolve into a forum for rigorous debate, or will political allegiances continue to dilute its purpose? For now, her message is clear—advisers owe the public candor, not compliance.